Social Psychology: Eyewitness Testimony Accuracy

Social PsychologyEye attestator Testimony AccuracyNameProfessorSchoolTable of ContentsIntroduction 3Hypothesis 4Methods 5Eyewitness Testimony 6Perception 7Acquisition point in cartridge clip 8Retention Stage 8Retrieval Stage 13Results /Conclusion 14Bibliography 17IntroductionIn all criminal , cultured and administrative trans solveions , show is necessary to present a quiticular position . Evidence is defined simply as a check of a particular particular . There ar tercet kinds of say that may be presented in act to splay a particular situation . These are : a ) determination or real evidence b ) documental evidence c ) testimonial evidenceObject evidence refers to any literal prey that may rehearsed to prove a particular position . Documentary evidence refers to the contents of the document that is presented in judgeship to prove a particular fact Testimonial evidence is that kind of evidence that makes routine of testimonies of witnesses or the victims or the charge as evidence to prove a particular fact (Andrew M . ColmanUnder the Federal Rules of Evidence , the only requirement for an rule out evidence to be admissible in court is that it must be relevant to the facts in issue and that it is not excluded by the Rules . On the other lot , there are much(prenominal) requirements prior to the admissibility of testimonial evidence . It is safe to conclude that legitimately , of the three kinds of evidence , the object evidence is considered as hypernym and more than reliable . It is said that object evidence speaks more eloquently than a hundred witnesses . On the other slip away , the testimonial evidence is considered the least reliable among the three kinds of evidenceHowever , the grab opposite happens inside the courtroom . The juries and judges treat witnes s testimonies and denominations as compelli! ng evidence ( Errors in Eyewitness acknowledgement Procedures ) Some authors even say that jurors overestimate the accuracy of witness testimony .

In a study conducted by Loftus and Doyle (1992 ) simulating the verdicts in a mock running , they found that in the ravel where there was no eyewitness only 18 gave extraordinary verdicts While the guilty verdicts increased to 72 if an eyewitness appointment is added ( Errors in Eyewitness identification Procedures ) This emphasis the swing that happens in every trial when there is an eyewitnessFurther , in an article endow Eyewitness Identification Procedures Recommendations for Polic e Line-ups and Photo spreads a cases involving the use of eyewitnesses as basis for conviction was evaluated . Of these 40 cases , 36 cases or 90 was later reversed proving that eyewitnesses have falsely impersonate the suspect . These data make eyewitness identifications a importunate risk to the administration of justice in our country (Barbara dungaree McAtlinThis research will limit its discussion on the opening night of false identifications by eyewitnesses during law of nature line-ups . I object to prove that if not properly administered eyewitness identification in police line-ups may be very risky on the part of the suspects and may lead to the witness pointing at a soulfulness other than the real culprit HYPOTHESISA witness is do to get hold of which among the suspect in...If you want to get a full essay, baseball club it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: ch! eap essay